| Date: | 2017-03-09 03:50:22 | |
| Sender: | Van Husson <ilrsqc.van.husson@gmail.com> | |
| Subject: | [RapidServiceMail] No.129: (Van-Husson) 1 millisecond time bias detected in Changchun (7237) data | |
| Content: | Dear Cunbo Fan and Xingwei Ha, The ILRS analysts would like to know if it is possible for your station to reprocess your Feb 16 and 17 data with the correct time (epochs) and then resubmit the corrected data (normal points) with an updated release flag? Also, I noticed that the LAGOES-1 pass on Feb 17 at 00:24 did not appear to have any time bias, but the passes before and after this pass did have the 1 millisecond time bias. Is there a plausible explanation for this (e.g. the event timer for this pass was synchronized to UTC)? Thanks for your help and regards, Van -- Van S Husson ILRS Quality Control Board ilrsqc.van.husson@gmail.com Dear Cunbo Fan and Xingwei Ha, The ILRS analysts would like to know if it is possible for your station to reprocess your Feb 16 and 17 data with the correct time (epochs) and then resubmit the corrected data (normal points) with an updated release flag? Also, I noticed that the LAGOES-1 pass on Feb 17 at 00:24 did not appear to have any time bias, but the passes before and after this pass did have the 1 millisecond time bias. Is there a plausible explanation for this (e.g. the event timer for this pass was synchronized to UTC)? Thanks for your help and regards, Van -- Van S Husson ILRS Quality Control Board |