Welcome >  Mailing Lists >  SLR-Mail No.44

SLR-Mail No.44

Back to Overview

Date:1997-03-04 16:00:00
Sender:Bill Purdy, Naval Research Laboratory <DSGJEH@cdslr3.atsc.allied.com>
Subject:[SLR-Mail] No. 44: TiPS NEWSLETTER
Author:Bill Purdy, Naval Research Laboratory
Content:********************************************************************************
SLR Electronic Mail 1997-03-04 16:00:00 UTC Message No. 44
********************************************************************************


Author: Bill Purdy, Naval Research Laboratory
Subject: TiPS NEWSLETTER



Hello again. TiPS is still in one piece, and going strong. The =
survival to date is now almost 8 months. We´ll be continuing to track =
TiPS through September 1997. We have struggled to get enough data to =
calculate the libration amplitudes lately for a variety of reasons that =
I´ll discuss later. We have seen that the in plane libration amplitude =
is now down to 4 degrees, +3, -1.

Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR)
We´ve learned a lot about what does and does not work with SLR for TiPS. =
It turns out that regular libration solutions of the TiPS system =
requires far more capability than presently exists in the global SLR =
network.

Here´s what works best:

Lots of data is needed for good, regular solutions. We would like ten =
passes per day. This is only practical when there are 30 or more =
terminator opportunities a day. We only see 30 or so days like this a =
year for TiPS.

- It is especially helpful to get data returns from both end bodies, =
Ralph and Norton.

=AD Switching from one end body to the other during a single pass is =
especially helpful.

- Data from two SLR stations simultaneously is very helpful in =
pinning down the solution.


Why is it so difficult to solve TiPS motion with SLR?

- No SLR returns from center of mass. With out a direct measurement =
of the center of mass of the tethered system, we must simultaneously =
solve for the orbital parameters and the libration parameters, all from a =
single set of data. TiPS center of mass is approximately a quarter of =
the way up the tether so it was impossible to place a retro reflector =
there. If the center of mass is very close to one of the end bodies the =
problem becomes a good deal easier.

- The large libration amplitude of TiPS further complicates the =
problems of acquiring data and solving for the behavior. Simply put, =
less motion narrows the playing field.

- The global SLR network is great at working on single body =
satellites. They typically require terminator assist only for the first =
day or two of tracking a retro reflector equipped satellite.

- We are simply using the SLR network for something it was not =
designed or optimized to do.

However.....

We are very proud of the work we have done in getting the solutions. =
Believe me, it hasn´t been easy. The things we have learned so far are =
entirely due to 1) the insight and dedication of the TiPS flight =
operation team and 2) the dedication and expertise of the people who make =
the SLR the powerful tool that it is. Particular credit goes to the =
tireless efforts of Jim Barnds in coaxing tether solutions out of the =
data.

Visual Data


The Air Force Maui Space Surveillance System (MSSS) has been tasked to =
track TiPS with their telescopes day and night. Unfortunately telescopes =
don´t quite work rain or shine. All the weather you have seen flooding =
the Pacific Northwest this winter has usually passed over Hawaii on the =
way. As such we´ve gotten very limited data from MSSS. We expect the =
data flow to improve with the weather.

Our use of visual data from telescopes is promising. It can and has been =
used to correlate the SLR based solutions and to get solutions for the =
out of plane libration. However we are only presently getting support =
from one station and the wheather has given us fits.

We would be interested in hearing about any other telescope sites we =
might be able to get observations from.

Our minimum optical requirements for gathering librational data from =
videotapes are:

-Tether shown at suitable size to be able to get a good measure of
orientation. Both end masses do not need to be visible, so long as a
fair length of tether is.
-Enough stars in the background to be able to determine the velocity =
vector.
-Time tag displayed on screen or at start of tape to be able to assign a
time to any frame to an accuracy of at most a few seconds. Ideally the
time tag would always be displayed on screen.


Future plans

We will be getting great terminator observing conditions from late March =
through early April. We will be combining radar data with the SLR Data =
in this period. This will be one last try at getting a solution that we =
can maintain without terminator acquisition. We are not getting our =
hopes up as we´ve finally come to grips with the degree of difficulty. =
This should be however, our best chance because we have the most =
experience, the libration angles are low and we have the assistance of =
radar data.

We will be tasking several organizations to analyze the TiPS libration =
data. The goal is to improve the understanding of long term tether =
dynamics and the prediction thereof.

Check out our website at http://hyperspace.nrl.navy.mil/TiPS. We´ve =
updated the website recently with the addition of the libration amplitude =
data.


Please send me updates for my email list. A while back my computer´s =
hard drive crashed. Believe me, it is worth the time to back up your =
hard drive.

We´ll that´s about it.


See you later,
Bill Purdy





From: DSGJEH@cdslr3.atsc.allied.com

********************************************************************************

Find more topics on the central web site of the Technical University of Munich: www.tum.de